Backend Exercise Evaluation Rubric
The following are guidelines that will be used in evaluating the Exercuse
Rubric_____/100 total
database
code
app integration and interfaces
|
NOTE: I gave you lambda code for /CreateUser, /getRoutes and /CreateRoute
Code Documenation (50 Points) - PEER Reviewed
- Name your Application ( 3points)
- Location of Code and Description of AVD (in detail --all permissions and settings given) (7 points)
- Give listing of source code files (3 points)
- For EACH file give a desciption of what it does ( 3points)
- LINK each filename above to the actual source code ( 4 points Upload Code.zip)
- SHOW A SEPERATE SCREEN SHOT FOR each new screen a user sees in using your application. (10 points for all screen shots, 5 points if any even one missing screen shot, 0 points if nothing turned in here)
- You must through emulator or on a real physical device demonstrated (and when possible give screen shots of results) of application using your device "feature" (10 points)
- This is a zip file of all your code files described in #2 above.
- This must include ALL code, xml, images, media and any other supporting files. EVERYTHING! (10 points if everything uploaded, 0 points if ANYTHING even one file missing)
Section Heading | Contents you should have |
1) Intro and Purpose, AVD specification Evaluation: 0 to 10 points |
|
2) Code Description Evaluation: 0 to 10 points |
|
3) Demonstration of Application working Evaluation: 0 to 10 points |
|
4) Device Feature Demonstration Evaluation: 0 to 10 points |
|
5) Code zipped up Evaluation: 0 to 10 points |
Application Working (125 points) - PEER Reviewed
Awarded Points Criteria 125 points (A)
- application working 100% as described in proposal
- device feature uses is NOT Trivial
- The application works seemlessly
113 points (low A)
- Application is not seemless to use --- do not understand interface unless someone explains it to you
- a few spelling / grammar mistakes in interface (hope not!!)
107 points (mid B)
- if most of the application is functioning
- possibly spelling mistakes, some minor issues with function or interface
NOTE: contact me if you think this student has done very little work and does not deserve a B.
0 points (F)
- nothing turned in.
Peer Review Accomplished (25 points) - Instructor assigned
Awarded Points Criteria 25 points (A)
- student has reviewed ALL other applications and given a written review of each both on Documentation and on Code itself.
- reviews are done very well
- reviewer showed problems in code if any
- reviewer evaluated each piece given in rubrics above
- reviewer made comments on how the application could be improved
21 points (mid B)
- reviewer missed errors in code (run time or logical)
- reviewer missed functional issues with applications (application responded in a way not desired or expected by application purpose)
0 points (F)
- no review done